Psychic or Frauds
SCEPTIC FRAUDS
Cheating Scientists
Dream Preconition News
Pictures of family
Psychic Detectives The truth is out there, we just have to find it.
  
SCEPTICS will try and tell you that a single failed experiment proves that what was being tested has been proven to be not real.. Take the reports of Natasha Demkina on  the CSICOP WEBSITE. so called scientists claim she is fraud  or deluded based on a single badly designed and conducted experiment. This is a disgusting suggestion buy disgusting so called scientists. I am shocked Prof Chris French of Goldsmiths in London supports such an organisation, but he does. THE TRUTH IS THIS.... You just have to make something happen once, find it once to be able to say what you discovered is REAL... You may spend a lifetime searching for it,  but find it just once and you have proven it real. Take a supernova,  may be see it once in a lifetime, but we know  they are real after finding just one. So why  do people like Chris French  devote their lives to  trying to  showing something is not real?  Do they suffer from some kind of pathological  desire to disbelieve?

Is there any psychic out there who is honest and not on the take? That is the Big Question. Sceptics are not always honest either, in fact most sceptics are more dishonest than the psychics they claim to expose as frauds. Many if not most "psychics" delude themselves but an academic who sets out to hishonestly deceive the public that psi or psychics cannot ever be real is a criminal. They ought and do know what they are doing and saying is a lie. There are even universities who employ these academics knowing they are frauds and liers. Many are promoted to professors in the hope that the truth about psi is not spread. They want to hush up the truth, but why?
Academic Frauds and the SPR

Academic Frauds and the SPR

 

The Society of Psychical Research

 

 

From it’s name you will be forgiven for thinking the SPR - Society for Psychical Research is just that.  But how much research does it do?  How dedicated is it to being an honest and open psychic research organisation? I have found that it has done almost no psychical research at all in the last 70 years. It has published many peer reviewed articles that amount to fraud and lies told by the academic sceptics who dominate the organisation. It has published two dishonest papers that got through peer review about my work. The unscientific papers it passes through its peer review censorship procedures are not limited to my work 

 

It seems to me that  the SPR only exists to take donations and ensure that genuine psychic research is kept from the public and it uses the peer reviewers system to mask the truth about real evidence of psychic ability. Its current President John Poynton accuses me of treachery,  when I exposed Professor Wiseman of being a  fraud, and being totally dishonest over the testing he and CSICOP did with Natasha Demkina. Wiseman is a well known debunker of anything psychical and uses dubious and dishonest tests to try and establish psi is not real. The media who often make vast sums from horoscopes and tarot telephone lines seem to support him. A search of the internet will reveal just how Wiseman and CSICOP operate. The SPR president refuses to correct the false and inaccurate papers they have published, and refuses to publish the very positive paper by Dr Schwartz.  I say this makes Poynton unfit to head a research organisation into psychical matters.  Read our recent e-mails here.  I would urge any of you to think very carefully before you donate money to any organisation claiming to conduct psychical research.  The SPR for example have found nothing positive establishing psi in a hundred years. 

 

 

Read more here.   http://www.archivefreedom.org

Dishonest University Professors and Skeptics V Honest Psychics

 

 

Not all psychic claims are genuine, no doubt of that.

But some who claim to be skeptics are making vast sums of money by telling lies about scientific experiments. They are not true skeptics, but they are frauds who are in many cases much worse criminals than the psychics they pretend they are exposing. Worse is the fact that many of the individuals are also paid university professors.

 

Do we want professors telling our students blatant lies and teaching them to be dishonest. NO  I am sure we do not.

 

I am investigating the conduct of many of these skeptics. Many of them are members of the SPR  Society of Psychical Research in London.

 

This society seems to protect these frauds and publishes there work as if it were scientific facts without the simplest of checks into the methods used. I am convinced this is criminal. This society is funded as a charity and people donate money to it for psychic research and they ought to be able to expect honesty from them.

 

Right now they are getting cover ups and bad science published and this could be costing lives…..